The development of a clinical management algorithm for early physical activity and mobilization of critically ill patients: Synthesis of evidence and expert opinion and its translation into practice
dc.contributor.author | Hanekom S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gosselink R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dean E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Van Aswegen H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Roos R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ambrosino N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Louw Q. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-10-13T16:59:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-10-13T16:59:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To facilitate knowledge synthesis and implementation of evidence supporting early physical activity and mobilization of adult patients in the intensive care unit and its translation into practice, we developed an evidence-based clinical management algorithm.Methods: Twenty-eight draft algorithm statements extracted from the extant literature by the primary research team were verified and rated by scientist clinicians (n=7) in an electronic three round Delphi process. Algorithm statements which reached a priori defined consensus-semi-interquartile range <0.5-were collated into the algorithm.Results: The draft algorithm statements were edited and six additional statements were formulated. The 34 statements related to assessment and treatment were grouped into three categories. Category A included statements for unconscious critically ill patients; Category B included statements for stable and cooperative critically ill patients, and Category C included statements related to stable patients with prolonged critical illness. While panellists reached consensus on the ratings of 94% (32/34) of the algorithm statements, only 50% (17/34) of the statements were rated essential.Conclusion: The evidence-based clinical management algorithm developed through an established Delphi process of consensus by an international inter-professional panel provides the clinician with a synthesis of current evidence and clinical expert opinion. This framework can be used to facilitate clinical decision making within the context of a given patient. The next step is to determine the clinical utility of this working algorithm. © 2011 The Author(s). | |
dc.description.version | Article | |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Rehabilitation | |
dc.identifier.citation | 25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 9 | |
dc.identifier.citation | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-80052745158&partnerID=40&md5=210108c7a7590a41d57f7d6cbfa1d784 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2692155 | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1177/0269215510397677 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/17150 | |
dc.title | The development of a clinical management algorithm for early physical activity and mobilization of critically ill patients: Synthesis of evidence and expert opinion and its translation into practice | |
dc.type | Article |