Effect of model updating strategies on the performance of prevalent diabetes risk prediction models in a mixed-ancestry population of South Africa

dc.contributor.authorMasconi, Katya L.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorMatsha, Tandi E.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorErasmus, Rajiv T.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorKengne, Andre P.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-25T07:55:37Z
dc.date.available2021-10-25T07:55:37Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-07
dc.descriptionCITATION: Masconi, K. L. et al. 2019. Effect of model updating strategies on the performance of prevalent diabetes risk prediction models in a mixed-ancestry population of South Africa. PLoS ONE, 14(2). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211528
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/
dc.description.abstractBackground: Prediction model updating methods are aimed at improving the prediction performance of a model in a new setting. This study sought to critically assess the impact of updating techniques when applying existent prevalent diabetes prediction models to a population different to the one in which they were developed, evaluating the performance in the mixed-ancestry population of South Africa. Methods: The study sample consisted of 1256 mixed-ancestry individuals from the Cape Town Bellville-South cohort, of which 173 were excluded due to previously diagnosed diabetes and 162 individuals had undiagnosed diabetes. The primary outcome, undiagnosed diabetes, was based on an oral glucose tolerance test. Model updating techniques and prediction models were identified via recent systematic reviews. Model performance was assessed using the C-statistic and expected/observed (E/O) events rates ratio. Results: Intercept adjustment and logistic calibration improved calibration across all five models (Cambridge, Kuwaiti, Omani, Rotterdam and Simplified Finnish diabetes risk models). This was improved further by model revision, where likelihood ratio tests showed that the effect of body mass index, waist circumference and family history of diabetes required additional adjustment (Omani, Rotterdam and Finnish models). However, discrimination was poor following internal validation of these models. Re-estimation of the regression coefficients did not increase performance, while the addition of new variables resulted in the highest discriminatory and calibration performance combination for the models it was undertaken in. Conclusions: While the discriminatory performance of the original existent models during external validation were higher, calibration was poor. The highest performing models, based on discrimination and calibration, were the Omani diabetes model following model revision, and the Cambridge diabetes risk model following the addition of waist circumference as a predictor. However, while more extensive methods incorporating development population information were superior over simpler methods, the increase in model performance was not great enough for recommendation.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0211528
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.format.extent12 pagesen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationMasconi, K. L. et al. 2019. Effect of model updating strategies on the performance of prevalent diabetes risk prediction models in a mixed-ancestry population of South Africa. PLoS ONE, 14(2). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211528
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203 (online)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211528
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/123295
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_ZA
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain rightsen_ZA
dc.subjectDiabetesen_ZA
dc.subjectHealth risk assessmenten_ZA
dc.subjectMedical geneticsen_ZA
dc.subjectDiabetes researchen_ZA
dc.subjectMedicine -- Statistical methodsen_ZA
dc.titleEffect of model updating strategies on the performance of prevalent diabetes risk prediction models in a mixed-ancestry population of South Africaen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
masconi_effect_2019.pdf
Size:
634.59 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: