ITEM VIEW

Belief driven sensemaking and strategy - arguing to identify and amplify weak signals

dc.contributor.advisorKinghorn, Johannen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Carol Juneen_ZA
dc.contributor.otherStellenbosch University. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences. Dept. of Information Science.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-09T14:37:21Z
dc.date.available2016-03-09T14:37:21Z
dc.date.issued2016-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/98588
dc.descriptionThesis (MPhil)--Stellenbosch University, 2016en_ZA
dc.description.abstractENGLISH ABSTRACT: This thesis is about arguing as a belief driven sensemaking process within a strategy making environment. It is a conceptual analysis which attempts to shed light on ways to improve the modern strategy making process, through investigating the belief driven aspects of sensemaking, and in particular arguing as a means of identifying and amplifying weak signals. The findings suggest that requisite variety in the identities of the stakeholders in a strategy making team is important; that mindful sensegiving by stakeholders and the leader not only ensures awareness but also a focus on the intuitive application of tacit knowledge to identify weak signals and communicate these to a strategy making team as narratives. Narratives are stories or scenarios which are then debated by the participants in the strategy making, through a sensemaking process of rational debate or arguing which causes participants to set aside previously held beliefs and expectations and create new knowledge, or strengthens existing expectations and knowledge. Although the study has found promising information which may add to the body of knowledge, this will need to be tested through empirical studies.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractAFRIKAANS OPSOMMING: Die tesis handel oor argumentasie as synde ‘n ‘belief driven’ proses van sinmaking in organisasies. Dit is ‘n konseptuele analise wat poog om lig te werp op strategiese prosesse in organisasies veral ten opsigte van swak seine. Die resultate dui daarop dat ‘requisite variety’ met betrekking tot die identiteit van deelnemers aan strategiese denke belangrik is, sowel as die vaardigheid van ‘mindfulness’af_ZA
dc.format.extentviii, 132 pagesen_ZA
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherStellenbosch : Stellenbosch Universityen_ZA
dc.subjectSensemaking theoryen_ZA
dc.subjectStrategic planningen_ZA
dc.subjectArgumentationen_ZA
dc.subjectCommunication in organizationsen_ZA
dc.subjectBelief driven sensemakingen_ZA
dc.subjectUCTD
dc.titleBelief driven sensemaking and strategy - arguing to identify and amplify weak signalsen_ZA
dc.typeThesisen_ZA
dc.rights.holderStellenbosch Universityen_ZA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

ITEM VIEW