ITEM VIEW

Certificate of need : dead and buried, or hibernating?

dc.contributor.authorDe Roubaix, Malcolmen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-18T14:56:58Z
dc.date.available2011-03-18T14:56:58Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.issn2078-5135 (online)
dc.identifier.issn0256-9574 (print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/7105
dc.descriptionCITATION: De Roubaix, M. 2006. Certificate of need : dead and buried, or hibernating? South African Medical Journal, 96(6):514-516.
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at http://www.samj.org.za
dc.description.abstractOn 2 May 2005, ten of the twelve chapters of the National Health Act (Act No. 61 of 2003) came into effect, generally with favourable reviews. I restrict myself to the motivation and ideology fundamental to Chapter 6 of the Draft Bill which (together with Chapter 8) was omitted in the Act, or rather, as the official government communiqué ominously asserted, ‘not yet proclaimed’. Chapter 6 deals among other things with the classification of health establishments as a precursor to the notorious Certificate of Need.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherHealth & Medical Publishing Group
dc.subjectSouth Africa. National Health Act, 2003en_ZA
dc.subjectPublic health laws -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.titleCertificate of need : dead and buried, or hibernating?en_ZA
dc.typeArticle
dc.description.versionPublisher’s version
dc.rights.holderSouth African Medical Journal


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

ITEM VIEW