ITEM VIEW

Karl Barth’s interpretative construal of the anhypostasis and enhypostasis of Christ’s human nature in relation to historical Protestant Orthodoxy

dc.contributor.authorHaley, James P.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T12:20:58Z
dc.date.available2019-01-15T12:20:58Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationHaley, J. P. 2017. Karl Barth’s interpretative construal of the anhypostasis and enhypostasis of Christ’s human nature in relation to historical Protestant Orthodoxy. Stellenbosch Theological Journal, 3(1):139-157, doi:10.17570/stj.2017.v3n1.a07
dc.identifier.issn2413-9467 (online)
dc.identifier.issn2413-9459 (print)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.17570/stj.2017.v3n1.a07
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/105310
dc.descriptionCITATION: Haley, J. P. 2017. Karl Barth’s interpretative construal of the anhypostasis and enhypostasis of Christ’s human nature in relation to historical Protestant Orthodoxy. Stellenbosch Theological Journal, 3(1):139-157, doi:10.17570/stj.2017.v3n1.a07.
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at http://ojs.reformedjournals.co.za/index.php/stj
dc.description.abstractWhile it is generally agreed that the anhypostasis and enhypostasis of Christ’s human nature have a place in Karl Barth’s Christology, there is little agreement over Barth’s interpretative construal of these concepts, particularly in relation to historical Protestant Orthodoxy. In this article I argue that Karl Barth adopts both anhypostasis and enhypostasis as a dual formula to explain how the human nature of Christ exists in union with the Logos. In this way Barth moves beyond Protestant orthodox tradition wherein the patristic Fathers, Lutheran and Reformed Scholastics, and the post-Scholastic dogmatics of Heinrich Schmid (Lutheran) and Heinrich Heppe (Reformed) consistently interpret anhypostasis and enhypostasis as autonomous concepts to explain how the human nature of Christ exists in union with the Logos. What Protestant orthodoxy understood as mutually exclusive concepts to explain the human nature of Christ, Karl Barth uniquely adopts as an ontological formula to explain how the human nature of Christ exists in union with the Logos.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://ojs.reformedjournals.co.za/index.php/stj/article/view/1468
dc.format.extent19 pages
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherPieter de Waal Neethling Trust
dc.subjectAnhypostasisen_ZA
dc.subjectEnhypostasisen_ZA
dc.subjectBarth, Karl, 1886-1968en_ZA
dc.subjectChristologyen_ZA
dc.titleKarl Barth’s interpretative construal of the anhypostasis and enhypostasis of Christ’s human nature in relation to historical Protestant Orthodoxyen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.rights.holderPieter de Waal Neethling Trust


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

ITEM VIEW