ITEM VIEW

Between a rock and a hard place : management and implementation teams’ expectations of project managers in an agile information systems delivery environment

dc.contributor.authorNkukwana, Songezoen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorTerblanche, Nicky H. D.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-10T12:01:32Z
dc.date.available2018-12-10T12:01:32Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationNkukwana, S. & Terblanche, N. H. D. 2017. Between a rock and a hard place : management and implementation teams’ expectations of project managers in an agile information systems delivery environment. South African Journal of Information Management, 19(1):a806, doi:10.4102/sajim.v19i1.806
dc.identifier.issn1560-683X (online)
dc.identifier.issn2078-1865 (print)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.4102/sajim.v19i1.806
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/105247
dc.descriptionCITATION: Nkukwana, S. & Terblanche, N. H. D. 2017. Between a rock and a hard place : management and implementation teams’ expectations of project managers in an agile information systems delivery environment. South African Journal of Information Management, 19(1):a806, doi:10.4102/sajim.v19i1.806.
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://sajim.co.za
dc.description.abstractBackground: To address the low success rate in information system (IS) projects, organisations in South Africa are adopting agile implementation methodologies. Agile delivery environments advocate an iterative approach where autonomous, self-organising teams share project management (PM) activities. This encroaches on the traditional project manager role. Are project managers still relevant in agile delivery environments and how should they adapt? Objectives: This case study investigated how project managers could adapt to agile IS implementation environments to remain relevant. Specifically, the views of their key stakeholders (the management and implementation teams) were elicited to provide insights into what is expected from agile project managers. Method: A qualitative, inductive content analysis approach using purposive sampling was used to identify 13 participants (comprising management and implementation team members) within a large South African insurance company. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with all participants. Results: The management and implementation teams agreed that PM remains highly relevant in an agile environment for ensuring project governance including delivery, risk management, reporting and budgeting. There was, however, disagreement between the management and implementation teams on project management interaction with the implementation team. Management preferred a command and control type project manager, while the implementation team favoured a more inclusive, facilitative PM style. Conclusion: To remain viable in an agile IS project implementation environment within large corporates, project managers need to be aware of what various stakeholders expect of them. They need to retain some of the classic PM functions while adapting to the interpersonal and collaborative requirements of the agile way.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://sajim.co.za/index.php/SAJIM/article/view/806
dc.format.extent10 pages ; illustrations
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherCONSAS
dc.subjectAgile project managementen_ZA
dc.subjectProject managers -- Workloaden_ZA
dc.titleBetween a rock and a hard place : management and implementation teams’ expectations of project managers in an agile information systems delivery environmenten_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain copyright


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

ITEM VIEW