ITEM VIEW

Reflections on the South African land reform programme : characteristics, dichotomies and tensions (part 2)

dc.contributor.authorPienaar, J. M.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-26T14:13:34Z
dc.date.available2018-09-26T14:13:34Z
dc.date.issued2014-01
dc.identifier.citationPienaar, J. M. 2014. Reflections on the South African land reform programme : characteristics, dichotomies and tensions (part 2). Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg, 2014(4):689-705.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1996-2207 (online)
dc.identifier.issn0257-7747 (print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/104511
dc.descriptionCITATION: Pienaar, J. M. 2014. Reflections on the South African land reform programme : characteristics, dichotomies and tensions (part 2). Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg, 2014(4):689-705.en_ZA
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://journals.co.za/content/journal/ju_tsaren_ZA
dc.description.abstractSouth Africa has grappled with land reform issues – superficially since 1991 and in-depth since 1994. Inevitably, questions arise as to whether the mechanics of intervention over time have indeed resulted in an aligned, sensible programme and whether a compelling argument can still be made to continue with land reform. In order to answer these questions, the “business of land reform” and the characteristics of the South African land reform programme also come into play. Given that the business of land reform is extremely complex in principle and requires a very particular approach in South Africa specifically, part 1 of this contribution illustrated that the land reform programme crafted and conducted here in South Africa is a rather unusual programme with particular characteristics concerning its origin, structure, mechanics and nature. In the second part of the contribution the focus shifts to the dichotomies and tensions inherent in the programme. This analysis is necessary in order to answer the question posed above, namely whether an aligned programme has indeed been crafted and whether, in light of the analysis that follows below, a compelling argument can still be made for continued land reform.en_ZA
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherJuta Lawen_ZA
dc.subjectland reform -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectland reform programme -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectland redistribution -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.titleReflections on the South African land reform programme : characteristics, dichotomies and tensions (part 2)en_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
dc.description.versionPublishers versionen_ZA
dc.rights.holderJuta Lawen_ZA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

ITEM VIEW