Department of Soil Science

Permanent URI for this community

https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/23

Browse

Browsing Department of Soil Science by Subject "Agricultural land -- Evaluation"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluating soil and terrain variables in a production environment: implications for agricultural land assessment
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2022-12) Barichievy, Kurt Russell; Clarke, Catherine E.; Rozanov, Andrei Borisovich; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Agrisciences. Dept. of Soil Science.
    ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Agricultural land in South Africa is under increasing pressure to produce more food from an ever-shrinking land base, as more land is being converted to non-productive uses. Additional to these pressures, is the concept of land reform and strategic land acquisition, aimed at agrarian transform within the rural landscape. It is estimated that less than 15% of South Africa is suitable for dryland cultivation. Consequently, the sustainable utilisation of these scarce resources and preservation of agricultural land is of paramount importance, to ultimately ensure some measure of national food security in the years to come. Agricultural land evaluation is a critical tool that can achieve this goal. Unfortunately, in recent decades the development of revised or novel land evaluation methodologies has stalled for South African farm-level assessments, the scale at which land release decisions are made. Further, the relationship between productivity and individual land assessment attributes has not been adequately quantified or incorporated into contemporary local assessment procedures. It is envisaged that this study would influence and help guide in-field methodologies, as well as draft legislation and best-practice strategies, with a view of both standardising and improving agricultural land assessment techniques. By emphasising the importance of agricultural land and the accurate assessment thereof, this research also aims to increase our understanding of production-based approaches at an operational scale, though the novel combination of traditional approaches and use of newer technologies. It is anticipated that this improved understanding will be employed to not only protect more agricultural land, which may have been undervalued by historical methods, but also as an intuitive assessment tool to highlight the yield gap between potential and actual production levels. A review of pertinent literature identified the need for local verification studies to evaluate the performance of land assessment methodologies currently used in industry. To address this, five methods were verified using land assessment polygons in a commercial production environment, in the Province of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The resultant classifications, derived from 225 soil observations, were compared to actual land use and precision yields achieved by dryland maize and soybean, across five growing seasons (2016 - 2020). By comparing land use with broad arability, four of the five land assessment methods were found to adequately classify arable land. Additionally, land evaluation polygons, linked to dryland precision maize and soybean yields can provide a general overview of method performance. However, it was concluded that yield performance and variation, across land evaluation methods and classes, is only explicit on or near a soil observation point where measurements are taken. Accordingly, seasonal variograms for maize and soybean were developed, to establish a representative yield buffer around individual soil observation points. This, along with yield normalisation strategies were employed, to improve verification procedures across multiple growing seasons. To determine crop productivity drivers, significant land assessment attributes inter alia slope, effective rooting depth, soil texture, soil group and soil wetness limitations were analysed against maize and soybean yields. It was found that the two crops respond differently to individual land assessment attributes and these differences should be taken cognisance of in new, crop-specific land evaluation methodologies and weighted accordingly. In an attempt to improve productivity-based land classification 78 attributes; derived from land assessment methodologies, digital terrain analysis, the pedological survey and soil colour spectrophotometry were collated. From these attributes, three new approaches, one based on biophysical scoring criteria and two based on machine learning, were developed across two commercial farming operations, in northern KwaZulu-Natal. These new methodologies were then tested on three separate commercial operations, located in different regions of the province. The biophysical scoring classification generally outperformed machine learning models and was particularly accurate when classifying observations associated with either extremely poor or extremely advantageous soil and terrain attributes. The transferability of the models to other regions, with different resources produced mixed results, highlighting the need for wider calibration in some instances. The study also found that the new productivity-based approaches can have useful applications in commercial farm management, where crop specific classification can identify underperforming areas and yields gaps, which can be ringfenced for appropriate interventions. The newly developed biophysical scoring classification was used to demonstrate the utility of these approaches in broader agricultural land release applications. The study found the new approaches better reflect production potential and should be used to supplement existing methodologies in land release assessments. Ultimately, the application of these production- based approaches can assist the land assessor to better classify the production potential of the land, as well as the decision-making authority to justify preserving more land for agricultural purposes.