Browsing by Author "Safodien, Sieyaam"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The molecular identification and characterisation of Eutypa dieback and a PCR-based assay for the detection of Eutypa and Botryosphaeriaceae species from grapevine in South Africa
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2007-12) Safodien, Sieyaam; Botha, Alfred; Smit, W. A.; Crous, P. W.; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Science. Dept. of Microbiology.
    ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Grapevine trunk diseases are caused by invasive pathogens that are responsible for the slow decline of vines. In particular, Eutypa dieback of grapevine has had a devastating impact on vineyards worldwide, reducing growth and yield, eventually killing the grapevine. The causal organism of Eutypa dieback was first described as Eutypa armeniacae Hansf. & Carter, the pathogen that causes dieback of apricots, but since 1987 this species has been considered a synonym of Eutypa lata (Pers.:Fr.) Tul & C. Tul (anamorph Libertella blepharis A. L. Smith). Recently, it was proposed that at least two species that are capable of infecting grapevines are responsible for Eutypa dieback. Consequently, the molecular identification and characterisation of Eutypa dieback was used to delineate the species occurring on infected grapevines in South Africa. This involved the molecular analyses of three molecular markers, namely, the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and large subunit (LSU) regions of the ribosomal DNA operon, and the -tubulin gene. The results obtained revealed the presence of a second species, namely, Eutypa leptoplaca (Mont.) Rappaz, that occurred together with E. lata on infected grapevines. Also co-habiting with these pathogens were related fungi form the Diatrypaceae family, Cryptovalsa ampelina (Nitschke) Fuckel and Eutypella vitis (Schwein.) Ellis & Everhart. Pathogenicity tests conducted on isolates representing C. ampelina, E. lata, E. leptoplaca, and E. vitis revealed that all were pathogenic to grapevine. Several species of Botryosphaeriaceae that commonly invade the woody tissue of grapevines are also pathogenic to grapevine. The symptoms in grapevine commonly associated with Botryosphaeriaceae are easily confused with the symptoms produced by Eutypa dieback which prompted the need for the development of a detection method that can correctly identify the presence of multiple pathogens. A reverse dot blot hybridisation (RDBH) method was subsequently applied to provide a rapid, accurate and reliable means of detecting the Eutypa species involved in the Eutypa disease complex, as well as those species of Botryosphaeriaceae known to cause disease in grapevines. The method involved the use of multiplex PCR to simultaneously amplify and label the regions of DNA that are used as pathogen specific probes. Consequently, membrane immobilised species-specific oligonucleotides synthesised from the ITS, - tubulin and LSU molecular data were evaluated during the application of this diagnostic method to detect Eutypa species. It was found that the species-specific oligonucleotides, designed from ITS sequence data, could consistently detect E. lata and E. leptoplaca. The application of the RDBH method for the detection of these Eutypa species, based on -tubulin and LSU sequence data, however, proved to be unsuccessful. Subsequently, a RDBH method, utilising species-specific oligonucleotides designed from elongation factor-1α sequence data, was successfully applied for the detection of Botyrosphaeria dothidea (Moug.:Fr.) Ces. & De Not., Neofusicoccum luteum (Pennycook & Samuels) Crous, Slippers & A.J.L. Phillips, Neofusicoccum parvum (Pennycook & Samuels) Crous, Slippers, A.J.L. Phillips and Neofusicoccum ribis (Slippers, Crous & M.J. Wingf.) Crous, Slippers & A.J.L. Phillips. The method, however, was unsuccessful for the detection of Diplodia seriata De Not. In addition to the above-mentioned shortcomings, the RDBH was not amenable to the detection of pathogens directly from field or environmental samples, but required preparation of DNA from pure cultures. The method, however, allows for the identification of multiple pathogens in a single assay. As DNA extraction methods are amended, improved and honed to obtain DNA from environmental samples, so would it increase the usefulness of RDBH.