Browsing by Author "Ezekannagha, Oluchi"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Development of a roadmap for mainstreaming nutrition-sensitive interventions in Anambra and Kebbi States, Nigeria
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2019-04) Ezekannagha, Oluchi; Mbhenyane, Xikombiso G.; Drimie, Scott; Von Fintel, Dieter; Maziya-Dixon, Busie; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Dept. of Global Health. Human Nutrition.
    ENGLISH SUMMARY : Malnutrition, though on a slight decline, has continued to be a problem in developing countries. The role of nutrition-sensitivity sectors as a linkage between immediate causes and basic causes of malnutrition has been increasingly recognised in recent years as positively associated with malnutrition reduction. Considering the accumulating evidence pointing to a strong relationship between malnutrition reduction and nutrition-sensitive sectors, including agriculture, education, water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH), and social protection, mainstreaming nutrition into these sectors has been widely discussed, designed and implemented in programmes and policies. Large-scale government programmes in nutrition-sensitive sectors are important elements of delivering nutrition-sensitive malnutrition-preventive benefits to the population. Mainstreaming nutrition into these cross-cutting sectors becomes imperative in the fight for malnutrition reduction. The Mainstreaming Nutrition Initiative Assessment (MNIA) is a framework developed for the assessment of mainstreaming nutrition (Menon et al, 2011), which measures the domains of epidemiology, operational and political commitment. However, there has been little attempt to explore its application in mainstreaming nutrition. The aim of the study was to develop a roadmap for mainstreaming nutrition-sensitivity in Anambra and Kebbi States, Nigeria. The study used a four-phased convergent parallel mixed methods design. In Phase 1, small area estimation methodology was employed to estimate local government prevalence of stunting in Nigeria. Phase 2 was carried out in two stages, first, a nutrition-sensitivity and potential checklist were used to determine the current nutrition-sensitivity and possible potential of programme execution in the various sectors in both states. Subsequently, a theory-based process evaluation that employed key informant interviews, document reviews, and site observations were used to determine the operational factors influencing the implementation of the programmes. In Phase 3, a political commitment rapid assessment test was administered in a workshop to explore the political realities regarding nutrition and nutrition-sensitivity in the states. In Phase 4, the data and information from the previous phases were employed to develop a roadmap for mainstreaming nutrition-sensitivity in both states, which was also validated by the stakeholders. Data were analysed using qualitative thematic analysis and MAXQDA software. LGA stunting prevalence estimations varied across the states. Kebbi State had high state average accompanied by very high LGA stunting estimates. Stunting prevalence in Kebbi State ranged from 54 percent to 67 percent. While in Anambra State, the stunting prevalence ranged from 17 percent to 25 percent, both states were in WHO category of medium to high stunting prevalence. The programmes assessed were averagely nutrition-sensitive but most of them had excellent potential to be highly nutrition-sensitive. The agricultural programmes have the best implementation while programmes in the WASH sector were the weakest in terms of implementation. The process evaluation showed that the programmes’ theory was validly nutrition-sensitive. The programmes had varied implementation dimensions, while the Agricultural Transformation Agenda Programme had a very high dose, the programmes reach was minimal. Programmes such as the Environmental Sanitation and Early Childhood Development Education has wide reach but lower dose and implementation. With regards to political commitment, while Kebbi had high expressed commitment, this was supported with the poor institutional commitment, unlike Anambra where strong institutional commitment existed but lacked financial support. From these findings, a roadmap for mainstreaming nutrition-sensitivity was developed and most stakeholders agreed that the roadmap was implementable and feasible. Future investigation is needed to replicate the study in other states. In addition, following-up Anambra and Kebbi states with the implementation of the roadmap may shed more light on the dynamics and role of the various domains in nutrition-sensitive mainstreaming.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Validation of a roadmap for mainstreaming nutrition-sensitive interventions at state level in Nigeria
    (BioMed Central, 2020) Ezekannagha, Oluchi; Drimie, Scott; Von Fintel, Dieter; Maziya-Dixon, Busie; Mbhenyane, Xikombiso
    Background: National programs are often developed with little consideration to the sub-national local factors that might affect program success. These factors include political support, capacity for implementation of program and variation in malnutrition indices being tackled. State context factors are evident in the distribution of malnutrition (e.g. high prevalence or gap among Local Government Areas), in the implementation of nutrition-sensitive interventions (e.g. access to early childhood education) and in the political economic context (e.g. presence of external funding agencies). Context is shaped by the economy, population, religion, and poverty, which impact everyday lives. Considering these contexts, a roadmap was developed and validated. The aim of this paper is to report expert review and stakeholder validation to determine feasibility of the developed contextualised roadmap for two Nigerian states. Methods: A validation tool was developed and reviewed using three experts. The content review occurred in two rounds to obtain recommendation and revisions of the developed roadmap and the validation tool. A pilot test of the roadmap and validation tool was done using two stakeholders in South Africa. The roadmap and the validation tool were then sent to the stakeholders and potential end-users in Nigeria using electronic media. Two research assistants were also engaged to deliver and collect hard copies to those who preferred it. Results: Of the ten stakeholders invited, nine responded. All participants showed an adequate understanding of the roadmap as evidenced by the scores given. Responses regarding the translation of the roadmap to implementation varied. The majority (86,6%) either strongly agreed or agreed that the actions were translatable (43.0 and 43.6% respectively). Conclusions: The final roadmap comprises of actions that are appropriate for the state’s context. It is recommended that stakeholders or end-users of any programme must be involved in the validation of such contextual programmes to improve chances of success.