Browsing by Author "Aldrich, C."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemDevelopment of fuzzy rule-based systems for industrial flotation plants by use of inductive techniques and genetic algorithms(Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2000) Aldrich, C.; Schmitz, G. P. J.; Gouws, F. S.Control of flotation processes is mostly managed by plant operators, who assess the performance of the plant based on their own experience and other heuristic rules. These rules tend to be subjective or ill-defined, since most of them are concerned with the structure of the flotation froth, such as colour, bubble size and shape distributions, froth mobility and froth stability. These phenomena are very difficult to quantify objectively, and inexperience on the part of the operators, human error, etc., can lead to significant inefficiencies in plant operation. In this paper the development of a fuzzy system to support the control decisions of plant operators is described, which leads to significantly smoother control action and more stable plant operation than could be obtained with crisp sets of rules or manual control strategies.
- ItemRecurrence quantification analysis of resting state EEG signals in autism spectrum disorder – a systematic methodological exploration of technical and demographic confounders in the search for biomarkers(BioMed Central, 2018-07-02) Heunis, T.; Aldrich, C.; Peters, J. M.; Jeste, S. S.; Sahin, M.; Scheffer, C.; De Vries, P. J.Background: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with a worldwide prevalence of 1–2%. In low-resource environments, in particular, early identification and diagnosis is a significant challenge. Therefore, there is a great demand for ‘language-free, culturally fair’ low-cost screening tools for ASD that do not require highly trained professionals. Electroencephalography (EEG) has seen growing interest as an investigational tool for biomarker development in ASD and neurodevelopmental disorders. One of the key challenges is the identification of appropriate multivariate, next-generation analytical methodologies that can characterise the complex, nonlinear dynamics of neural networks in the brain, mindful of technical and demographic confounders that may influence biomarker findings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the robustness of recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) as a potential biomarker for ASD using a systematic methodological exploration of a range of potential technical and demographic confounders. Methods: RQA feature extraction was performed on continuous 5-second segments of resting state EEG (rsEEG) data and linear and nonlinear classifiers were tested. Data analysis progressed from a full sample of 16 ASD and 46 typically developing (TD) individuals (age 0–18 years, 4802 EEG segments), to a subsample of 16 ASD and 19 TD children (age 0–6 years, 1874 segments), to an age-matched sample of 7 ASD and 7 TD children (age 2–6 years, 666 segments) to prevent sample bias and to avoid misinterpretation of the classification results attributable to technical and demographic confounders. A clinical scenario of diagnosing an unseen subject was simulated using a leave-one-subject-out classification approach. Results: In the age-matched sample, leave-one-subject-out classification with a nonlinear support vector machine classifier showed 92.9% accuracy, 100% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity in differentiating ASD from TD. Age, sex, intellectual ability and the number of training and test segments per group were identified as possible demographic and technical confounders. Consistent repeatability, i.e. the correct identification of all segments per subject, was found to be a challenge. Conclusions: RQA of rsEEG was an accurate classifier of ASD in an age-matched sample, suggesting the potential of this approach for global screening in ASD. However, this study also showed experimentally how a range of technical challenges and demographic confounders can skew results, and highlights the importance of probing for these in future studies. We recommend validation of this methodology in a large and well-matched sample of infants and children, preferably in a low- and middle-income setting.