Research Articles (Anaesthesiology and Critical Care)
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing Research Articles (Anaesthesiology and Critical Care) by Author "Chetty, S."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemAn audit of the labour epidural analgesia service at a regional hospital in Gauteng Province, South Africa(Health and Medical Publishing Group, 2018) Leonard, T. G. A.; Perrie, H.; Scribante, J.; Chetty, S.Background. Neuraxial analgesia in the form of a labour epidural has been shown to be the most effective analgesic strategy for the labouring mother. In developed countries, data are readily available as to the number of women receiving labour epidural analgesia, as well as the complication rates of labour epidurals. However, data for South Africa (SA) on labour epidural analgesia services are limited, and there were no published data for Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital (RMMCH), Johannesburg, SA. Objective. To describe the labour epidural analgesia service at RMMCH over the period of 1 year. Methods. A retrospective audit using consecutive convenience sampling was done reviewing all epidural records at RMMCH from 1 January to 31 December 2014. Results. During the study period, labour epidural analgesia was administered for 187 (1.6%) of 11 853 deliveries. Epidural records were collected for all administered labour epidurals. The most common indications documented were labour analgesia (41.7%) and primigravida (28.9%). Labour epidurals were not administered for specific medical conditions. The incidence of complications was 22.6%, and these were minor and self-limiting. Hypotension was the most common complication (12.3%). Patient satisfaction with labour epidural analgesia, where documented, was high (98.4%). Conclusion. This audit revealed a low incidence of labour epidural analgesia at RMMCH during the study period. The incidence of complications was in keeping with that seen in developed countries. Poor documentation was noted to be a problem.
- ItemThe Critical Care Society of Southern Africa Consensus Guideline on ICU triage and rationing (ConICTri)(Health and Medical Publishing Group (HMPG), 2019-08) Joynt, G. M.; Gopalan, D. P.; Argent, A. A.; Chetty, S.; Wise, R.; Lai, V. K. W.; Hodgson, E.; Lee, A.; Joubert, I.; Mokgokong, S.; Tshukutsoane, S.; Richards, G. A.; Menezes, C.; Mathivha, R. L.; Espen, B.; Levy, B.; Asante, K.; Paruk, F.Background: In South Africa (SA), administrators and intensive care practitioners are faced with the challenge of resource scarcity as well as an increasing demand for intensive care unit (ICU) services. ICU services are expensive, and practitioners in low- to middle-income countries experience the consequences of limited resources daily. Critically limited resources necessitate that rationing and triage (prioritisation) decisions are routinely necessary in SA, particularly in the publicly funded health sector. Purpose: The purpose of this guideline is to utilise the relevant recommendations of the associated consensus meeting document and other internationally accepted principles to develop a guideline to inform frontline triage policy and ensure the best utilisation of adult intensive care in SA, while maintaining the fair distribution of available resources. Recommendations: An overall conceptual framework for the triage process was developed. The components of the framework were developed on the basis that patients should be admitted preferentially when the likely incremental medical benefit derived from ICU admission justifies admission. An estimate of likely resource use should also form part of the triage decision, with those patients requiring relatively less resources to achieve substantial benefit receiving priority for admission. Thus, the triage system should maximise the benefits obtained from ICU resources available for the community. Where possible, practical examples of what the consensus group agreed would be considered appropriate practice under specified South African circumstances were provided, to assist clinicians with practical decision-making. It must be stressed that this guideline is not intended to be prescriptive for individual hospital or regional practice, and hospitals and regions are encouraged to develop specified local guidelines with locally relevant examples. The guideline should be reviewed and revised if appropriate within 5 years. Conclusion: In recognition of the absolute need to limit patient access to ICU because of the lack of sufficient intensive care resources in public hospitals, this guideline has been developed to guide policy-making and assist frontline triage decision-making in SA. This document is not a complete plan for quality practice, but rather a template to support frontline clinicians, guide administrators and inform the public regarding appropriate triage decision-making.