Masters Degrees (Physiotherapy)
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing Masters Degrees (Physiotherapy) by browse.metadata.advisor "Bester, M. M."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemThe effect of passive thoracic flexion-rotation movement on the total static compliance of the respiratory system and respiratory responses in ventilated patients(Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2007-03) Bergh, Alison; Hanekom, S. D.; Bester, M. M.; University of Stellenbosch. Faculty of Health Sciences. Dept. of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences. Physiotherapy.AIM: The aim of this study was threefold. Firstly to determine the effect of passive thoracic flexion-rotation (PTFR) movement on the total static compliance of the respiratory system, tidal volume, respiratory rate and plateau pressure. Secondly, to identify the interventions used by physiotherapists to influence compliance and thirdly to compare the effects of these interventions. DESIGN: A one group, pre-test-post-test physiological study and a systematic review of the literature were performed. METHOD: A randomised sample consisting of 18 intubated and ventilated subjects of varying periods of ventilation and various conditions was obtained. The interventions used included tactile stimulation and PTFR movements. Subjects acted as their own controls. Objective variables namely tidal volume, respiratory rate and plateau pressure were recorded by a research assistant. These measurements were taken immediately following the intervention and repeated again three times in an interval of 20 minutes after the movement was discontinued. Total static compliance of the respiratory system was calculated as tidal volume divided by the difference between plateau pressure and positive end-expiratory pressure. The search strategy for the systematic review included the searching of five databases, a secondary search (pearling) and a hand search. Two independent reviewers agreed on the inclusion of articles and their methodological quality. A critical review form (Law et al 1998) was used for scoring methodological quality and a hierarchy of evidence for allocating the level of evidence of each study. Inclusion criteria were experimental studies, written in English and published after January 1995. Participants were intubated, ventilated humans, over the age of 18.
- ItemA study to determine the motor proficiency of children between the ages of six and ten years diagnosed with ADHD in the Cape Metropole(Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2004-04) Statham, S. B.; Bester, M. M.; Faure, M.; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Dept. of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences. Occupational Therapy.ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Background: Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) have been reported to have motor proficiency problems. Few studies have established the extent of these motor problems and few studies investigate both gross and fine motor proficiency. The studies which do investigate motor proficiency, often also include other aspects, for example physical fitness, grip strength or kinaesthesia. It is important to be able to identify motor proficiency deficit in this population group early for appropriate intervention to be as effective as possible. The first step in this process is to identify the areas of motor proficiency deficits experienced by these children. Study Design: A cross-sectional descriptive study was done. Objective: The main aim of this study was to establish if children with ADHD demonstrate motor proficiency problems. A second aim was to identify in which areas of motor proficiency they have the most problems. Method: A sample of 28 boys and 9 girls (n = 37) children with ADHD, between the ages of six and ten, were identified by the medical practitioners at four school clinics in the Cape Metropole. The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency was used to test the children. The demographic and other factors that could have affected the motor proficiency in these children were recorded. Results: The range, mean and standard deviation were calculated for all the subtests and the three composite scores. Eighty-one percent of children scored below the expected norm on the Battery Composite Score (20th percentile) with the difference in age equivalent scores being significantly different (p < 0.01), the Gross Motor Composite Score (20th percentile and p < 0.01) and on the Running Speed and Agility Subtest (p < 0.01), the Balance Subtest (p < 0.01), Strength Subtest (p < 0.01) and the Upper Limb Coordination Subtest (p < 0.01). No significant motor proficiency problems were identified in the Fine Motor Composite Score (35th percentile), the Bilateral Coordination Subtest, the Response Speed Subtest, the Visual motor Subtest or the Visual Motor Control Subtest. Conclusions: These results support the literature in so far as motor proficiency deficits are present in children with ADHD, which in turn supports the need for early identification of these problems.