Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAtkins, Salla 
dc.contributor.authorLewin, Simon 
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Helen 
dc.contributor.authorEngel, Mark 
dc.contributor.authorFretheim, Atle
dc.contributor.authorVolmink, Jimmy
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-14T12:55:22Z
dc.date.available2010-12-14T12:55:22Z
dc.date.issued2008-04
dc.identifier.citationAtkins, S, Lewin, S, Smith, H, Engel, M, Fretheim, A & Volmink, J 2008, 'Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt', BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1):21.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1471-2288
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-21
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/5112
dc.description.abstractBackground: Qualitative synthesis has become more commonplace in recent years. Meta-ethnography is one of several methods for synthesising qualitative research and is being used increasingly within health care research. However, many aspects of the steps in the process remain ill-defined. Discussion: We utilized the seven stages of the synthesis process to synthesise qualitative research on adherence to tuberculosis treatment. In this paper we discuss the methodological and practical challenges faced; of particular note are the methods used in our synthesis, the additional steps that we found useful in clarifying the process, and the key methodological challenges encountered in implementing the meta-ethnographic approach. The challenges included shaping an appropriate question for the synthesis; identifying relevant studies; assessing the quality of the studies; and synthesising findings across a very large number of primary studies from different contexts and research traditions. We offer suggestions that may assist in undertaking meta-ethnographies in the future. Summary: Meta-ethnography is a useful method for synthesising qualitative research and for developing models that interpret findings across multiple studies. Despite its growing use in health research, further research is needed to address the wide range of methodological and epistemological questions raised by the approach.en_ZA
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_ZA
dc.subjectMeta-ethnographyen_ZA
dc.subjectTuberculosis treatmenten_ZA
dc.titleConducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature : lessons learnten_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
dc.date.updated2010-11-02T19:15:16Z
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderAtkins et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en_ZA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record