Horace on Augustus : fact or fiction?
Date
2004
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Stellenbosch University, Department of Ancient Studies
Abstract
Quot homines tot sententiae seems a good summary of the variety of critical readings of lyric poetry in general and of Horace’s position on Augustus in particular. This raises the interesting question of the position of factual information in poetry: does lyric as genre imply a choice for fiction as opposed to fact or can some references to contemporary personalities or incidents be taken as realistic? In this case specifically: can what Horace says about Augustus be taken as a realistic assessment of the emperor? To complicate matters, Augustus was a powerful personage who wanted and often managed to put his own stamp on things1 — in himself an embodiment of the opposition between fact and fiction. Given this undoubtedly heady mix, the paper will try to make some
Description
CITATION: Thom, S. 2004. Horace on Augustus : fact or fiction? Akroterion, 49:67-72, doi:10.7445/49-0-88.
The original publication is available at http://akroterion.journals.ac.za
The original publication is available at http://akroterion.journals.ac.za
Keywords
Laudatory poetry, Latin, Horace -- Criticism and interpretation, Rome -- History -- Augustus, 30 B.C.-14 A.D., Augustus -- Emperor of Rome -- 63 B.C.-14 A.D.
Citation
Thom, S. 2004. Horace on Augustus : fact or fiction? Akroterion, 49:67-72, doi:10.7445/49-0-88