Widespread plant species: natives versus aliens in our changing world

Stohlgren T.J. ; Pysek P. ; Kartesz J. ; Nishino M. ; Pauchard A. ; Winter M. ; Pino J. ; Richardson D.M. ; Wilson J.R.U. ; Murray B.R. ; Phillips M.L. ; Ming-yang L. ; Celesti-Grapow L. ; Font X. (2011)

Estimates of the level of invasion for a region are traditionally based on relative numbers of native and alien species. However, alien species differ dramatically in the size of their invasive ranges. Here we present the first study to quantify the level of invasion for several regions of the world in terms of the most widely distributed plant species (natives vs. aliens). Aliens accounted for 51.3% of the 120 most widely distributed plant species in North America, 43.3% in New South Wales (Australia), 34.2% in Chile, 29.7% in Argentina, and 22.5% in the Republic of South Africa. However, Europe had only 1% of alien species among the most widespread species of the flora. Across regions, alien species relative to native species were either as well-distributed (10 comparisons) or more widely distributed (5 comparisons). These striking patterns highlight the profound contribution that widespread invasive alien plants make to floristic dominance patterns across different regions. Many of the most widespread species are alien plants, and, in particular, Europe and Asia appear as major contributors to the homogenization of the floras in the Americas. We recommend that spatial extent of invasion should be explicitly incorporated in assessments of invasibility, globalization, and risk assessments. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.(outside the USA).

Please refer to this item in SUNScholar by using the following persistent URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/14850
This item appears in the following collections: