ITEM VIEW

A decade and a half of deference (part 1)

dc.contributor.authorMaree, P. J. H.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorQuinot, Geoen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-27T10:25:02Z
dc.date.available2018-09-27T10:25:02Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.citationMaree, P.J.H. & Quinot, G. 2016. A decade and a half of deference (part 1). Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg, 2016(2):268-280.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1996-2177 (online)
dc.identifier.issn0257-7747 (print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/104522
dc.descriptionCITATION: Maree, P.J.H. & Quinot, G. 2016. A decade and a half of deference (part 1). Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg, 2016(2):268-280.en_ZA
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://journals.co.za/content/journal/jlc_tsaren_ZA
dc.description.abstractIn 2000 Hoexter published an article on judicial review that became very influential in South African administrative-law scholarship and jurisprudence. In her article Hoexter raised the notion of deference in judicial review of administrative action. While she concluded on the pessimistic note that “the debate about deference … will be cancelled owing to lack of interest”, her article has been cited with approval in a number of judgments, including the influential constitutional court judgment of O’Regan J in the Bato Star case.en_ZA
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherJuta Lawen_ZA
dc.subjectSouth African administrative-law -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectdeference debate -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.subjectPromotion of Administrative Justice Act -- South Africaen_ZA
dc.titleA decade and a half of deference (part 1)en_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
dc.description.versionPublishers versionen_ZA
dc.rights.holderJuta Lawen_ZA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

ITEM VIEW